| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | The .reason. for the new British Mailing lists |
* Forwarded (from: GEN_BRITAIN) by Stephen Hayes using timEd/2 1.10.y2k.
* Originally from Stephen Hayes (8:7903/10) to Rod Neep.
* Original dated: Wed Mar 26, 07:18
Rod Neep wrote in a message to All:
RNlistcoord{at}british-genealogy.com>
RN> Let me explain the complete history, and hence the reasons for
RN> setting up new British mailing lists and a new system.
RN> In the beginning, before the days of the Internet as we know it
RN> today, a group of us established a bulletin board system here in
RN> Britain, effectively just the same as mailing lists, (at that time
RN> called "forums") discussing genealogy. We set up individual
RN> dial-in computers in each local telephone area, so that people
RN> could connect using a local phone call. This was back in the days
RN> of 1200/75 bits per second modems. (1200 receive, 75 send. Putting
RN> that in perspective, a character "a" of plain text takes up 7
RN> bits). Slow. Very slow indeed!
RN> Each night, each computer had a time slot to dial into a "hub"
RN> computer to transfer all the day's mail, and to collect the mail
RN> from other computers. We established a "web" of computers
RN> throughout Britain in this way, and in the end, we had 65
RN> inter-linked computers, shuffling genealogy mail throughout
RN> Britain, using a software called "Wildcat". Messages posted one
RN> end of the country on a local bulletin board system took at least
RN> one day, and sometimes two, to reach a computer at the other end
RN> of the country so that others could read it. And a day or two to
RN> receive a reply. Heady stuff.
I still run a BBS connected to Fidonet and FamilyNet, and I am replying to
this message on the FamilyNet BBS side, since the newsgroup is also gated
into the FamilyNet BBS network.
I prefer the BBS software to the newsgroup software, as the BBS software
was written for interactive (many-to-many) discussion, whereas newsgroup
software was written for one-to-many discussion, and mailinglist software
is an unsatisfactory kludge of e-mail software, which was designed for
one-to-one communication.
The Fidonet BBS network still exists, and has several genealogy forums --
it's a pity that more people don't make use of them, since in many ways, as
I have pointed out, they are better than mailing lists.
For more information about genealogy BBSs see the following web page:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7783/bbs1.htm
Keep well
Steve Hayes
WWW: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/steve.htm
E-mail: hayesstw{at}yahoo.com
___ timEd/2 1.10.y2k
- Origin: Khanya BBS, Tshwane, South Africa [012] 333-0004 (8:7903/10)
--- WtrGate v0.93.p9 Unreg
* Origin: Khanya BBS, Tshwane, South Africa [012] 333-0004 (5:7106/20)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 7106/20 22 7102/1 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.