0n (21 Jan 07) bob klahn wrote to !ALL!...

 bk> ...

 bk>  BF>> Of course we don't need a moderator but what would happened if
 bk>  BF>> someone came here and started to stir thing up?

 bk>  CH>>  Baiting them will help.

 bk>  RN>> Not my style.

 CH> Good then this matter is settled and we'll just go our
 CH> merry way the way we have been for about two peaceful years
 CH> now.

 bk>  Ok, everyone... now doesn't this sound like a moderator
 bk>  decision?

 bk>  Which suggests I was right to nominate Cindy for moderator.


 I DON'T Want it and I don't WANT a moderator. :( WE MODERATE
OURSELVES. We have and there's NO Reason to change this, Bob.

 No reason other than somebody who needs to be a moderator and this
will attract trouble because trouble enjoys challenging moderators. I
don't want to be a moderator.

Why can't we just LEAVE well enough alone?

Cindy


... It's easier to curse the candle than light the darkness.

--- PPoint 3.01