JP> PE>
JP>   > E.g. how many people don't see 3 things in
JP>   > the following program that make it non-ISO?
JP>   >
JP>   > // Print hello world!
JP>   >
JP>   > void main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
JP>   > {
JP>   >     printf("hello world\n");
JP>   > }
JP> PE>
JP> 
JP>   Three ?  I see at least five.
JP> 
JP>   ( Wrong return type for `main', POSIX 1003 extension for environment
JP>     pointer, lack of a return statement in `main', lack of inclusion of
JP>     the  header, and use of C++ comments in a C program. )

PMFJI, but, there is no particular reason why this is C code as
opposed to C++ code. While it does not use ostream_withassign (cout)
for output but rather, the C function printf(...) this is perfectly
valid in C++, since C++ incorporates such C-isms. Perhaps I'm missing
something in the thread.

___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X If at first you don't succeed, put out another version (KWQ 1.2i)

--- Maximus/2 3.00