0n (22 Jan 07) bob klahn wrote to CINDY HAGLUND...

 bk> ...

 bk>  bk>>  Which suggests I was right to nominate Cindy for moderator.

 bk>  bk>>  All in favor?

 CH>  I say no because we never needed one before and to have
 CH>  one just invites trouble.

 bk>  That's like saying having police just invites crime.

 No Bob. It's just that there has BEEN NO PROBLEM here and I really
WOULD like to know why it is now. YOu could netmail me about it.

 CH> BUT IF I am outvoted I will submit kindly ... sigh. I
 CH> suppose. As long as we can stick to the same light and easy
 CH> going discussions with no personal attacks.

 bk>  That's the idea.

 Yeah.

 CH> PLEASE tell me just how all this got started and WHO
 CH> started it? I must have missed the message. I got behind
 CH> and did not read all of them trying to catch up. Thanks.

 bk>  Actually, you did. You posted something political, and

 OH gee my fault. It was humor though. I didn't think a little spot of
humor was going to cause trouple. And when YOU warned me about it
Didn't I say okay? No more of that? End of story?

I suppose it would have been okay had it been a different sort of
political humor? Just replace the names in most political jokes and
you can cut both sides at the same time. It was just a joke.

 bk>  controversial, and then decided to abandon it to avoid the risk
 bk>  of attracting the nasties. I followed up with the suggestion
 bk>  that we need a cop (moderator) to tell the nasties to go away.

Nod. Well didn't I moderate myself by agreeing with you not to do it
again?

So Bob, you be the moderator then.

Cindy

--- PPoint 3.01