From: "Geo." 

"Rich"  wrote in message news:3e334583{at}w3.nls.net...
>>And since you have forgotten, the complex scenario in the report we have
been discussing did not need to use WMP to tell IE to open an HTML page as
IE was already open and could have done it itself.<<

this thread has been too long, remind me of how you came to the conclusion
that IE was already open and how it could have done this itself? I thought
the whole process was kicked off by the stealth commands in the media file?

 >  Anyway, I'm sure you are aware that you selectively edited my message
when you replied to exclude some relevant points.<

I did selectively edit it but I didn't mean anything by it. All I'm doing
in these edits is quoting back what part of your post I'm replying to, if I
don't quote back some section of it that's because I'm not addressing that
section, that's all.

>  You look slimey.<

I consider it efficient. I consider it a waste of disk space on everyone's
computer to keep an entire copy of the thread in each post.

>  Maybe we should just stick with your silly philosophy and acknowledge
that everything is your fault since it is your actions that would be the
trigger for any vulnerability of this that you would be exposed to.
Remember, it is your actions that are not safe by any stretch of the
imagination.<

Why is it you don't want anyone here to consider you the same as microsoft
or to think your opinion is anything but your personal opinion but as soon
as we critisize something MS you take it so personally? When you complain
that you are being treated like you were MS this is the reason, you take it
personal and then make it personal. I didn't mean to insult YOU with my
media player comment, it was you who took it that way.

If you can't separate yourself from MS, how can you expect us to?

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4