This Echo is READ ONLY !   NO Un-Authorized Messages Please!
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FYI
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Science Policy News
Number 28: February 19, 2003

OSTP Highlights FY 2004 Physical Sciences Request; Final PCAST Letter

The Office of Science and Technology Policy issued seven budget 
documents with the release of the FY 2004 budget request.  One of 
these documents was entitled, "The Physical Sciences: Research and 
Development Funding in the President's FY 2004 Budget."  This one-page 
brief highlights the budget requests for NSF, DOE, and NASA, and is as 
follows:

"Research in the physical sciences supports health science research; 
leads to a better understanding of the universe; and spurs progress in 
a host of other areas, including information technologies, defense 
technologies, energy, agriculture, and the environment.

"The 2004 Budget strengthens the nation's investment in the physical
sciences by making significant investments in a number of priority 
areas:

"National Science Foundation (NSF). The President's Budget increases 
the overall NSF budget by $453 million, or about nine percent.  Of  
Note:

"NSF physical science investments alone would increase by $100 
million, or 13 percent, in programs. This represents an increase of 35 
percent, or $219 million, over investments of just five years ago.

"Major Research Equipment and Facility Construction (MREFC) would 
receive a 60 percent, $202 million, increase - which would greatly 
help fund MREFC Projects approved by the National Science Board.

"The MREFC investments also include $60 million in funding for 'Ice 
Cube', a unique neutrino observatory at the South Pole.

"Department of Energy (DOE). The President's Budget provides $5.2 
billion for federal science and technology at the Department of 
Energy, a three percent increase from the 2003 request.  Of Note:

"The FreedomFUEL initiative will provide a total of $3.2 billion, 
including $720 million in new funding over the next five years to 
develop the technologies and infrastructure needed to produce, store, 
and distribute hydrogen fuel for use in fuel cell vehicles and 
electricity generation.

"The DOE Office of Science would receive $3.3 billion, an increase of 
about two percent. However, since construction funding for the 
Spallation Neutron Source will be reallocated, the available funds for 
Office of Science core research programs actually increases by $117 
million or 4.2 percent, with priority given to operating the Office's 
existing suite of large national scientific user facilities.

"The Office of Science at the Department of Energy almost triples its
investment in unique nanoscale science research centers, with a 
proposed increase of $63 million to begin construction, design, or 
equipment procurement for four new centers, bringing the total number 
of funded nano-centers to five.

"National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The NASA budget
provides nearly $9.2 billion for federal science and technology 
programs at NASA, a 5-percent increase, with $4 billion for space 
science.  Of Note:

"A new $31 million investment in optical communications technology 
would increase the scientific and educational outcomes of future 
planetary missions.

"Two new missions to undertake research at the intersection of physics 
and astronomy, LISA and CON-X, would commence with $59 million. LISA 
is the laser interferometer space antenna (space-based gravity wave 
detector) and CON-X is a next-generation x-ray telescope for, among 
other things, imaging x-ray emission from black holes.

"A Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter Mission, to search for life on Jupiter's 
moons and demonstrate breakthrough power propulsion technologies, 
would receive $93 million."


At about the same time, the President's Council of Advisors on Science 
and Technology (PCAST) released the final version of the letter first 
drafted on August 28, 2002 (see FYI #101 in 2002.)  There was a 
reworked version of this letter dated October 10 (see FYI #7 in 2003.)  
During the August conference call that reviewed this draft letter 
there was considerable discussion about federal funding for the 
physical sciences.  The PCAST web site states that four reports were 
drafted and approved by PCAST in 2002, and provides the following 
link, 
http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/FINAL%20R&D%20REPORT%20WITH%20LETTERS.pdf to 
the report on "Assessing U.S. R&D Investment."  In an October 16 cover 
letter found on this site to President Bush, PCAST co-chairs John H.  
Marburger and E. Floyd Kvamme state:

"In brief, the report explores issues surrounding the historical 
patterns of federal investments in science and technology, and 
provides several recommendations on how to address these issues. The 
PCAST understood that the doubling of the National Institutes of 
Health's budget has been completed and the current budget situation is 
constrained. Accordingly, the report suggests targeting the physical 
sciences and certain engineering fields (that cross-cut several 
agencies) for budgetary reallocation given their importance to our 
nation's economic well-being and competitiveness in order to better 
balance the available budget dollars."

An accompanying letter from G. Wayne Clough, Chair of the panel 
writing the report, to Marburger and Kvamme, outlines the panel's 
first recommendation:

"All evidence points to a need to improve funding levels for physical
sciences and engineering. Continuation of present patterns will lead 
to an inability to sustain our nation's technical and scientific 
leadership. We recommend that beginning with the FY04 budget and 
carrying through the next four fiscal years, funding for physical 
sciences and engineering across the relevant agencies be adjusted 
upward to bring them collectively to parity with the life sciences."

###############
Richard M. Jones
Media and Government Relations Division
The American Institute of Physics
fyi{at}aip.org
(301) 209-3094
##END##########

 - End of File -
================

---