From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00BF_01C2C9E3.A2593670
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   No it's not.  There you claimed that updates weren't being installed. =
 Also, I don't install random non-secuirty related hotfixes.

Rich

  "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:3e3bdafd$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e3af105{at}w3.nls.net...
  >>   Q317748 may have been published in October but it is older than =
that.
  If you are simply claiming that the folks that published that old =
hotfix
  from before MS02-039 should have updated it to a current version of =
the DLL
  I agree.  This is a special case<<

  this is the problem that you just said you didn't see in your previous =
post.
  It's happened with NT patches as well although I didn't document that =
in
  this thread, trust me it's happened.

  Geo.


------=_NextPart_000_00BF_01C2C9E3.A2593670
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   No it's
not.  There =
you claimed=20
that updates weren't being installed.  Also, I don't install random =

non-secuirty related hotfixes.
 
Rich
 

  "Geo." <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote=20
  in message news:3e3bdafd$1{at}w3.nls.net..."Rich"=20
  <{at}> wrote in message news:3e3af105{at}w3.nls.net...>=
>  =20
  Q317748 may have been published in October but it is older than =
that.If=20
  you are simply claiming that the folks that published that old =
hotfixfrom=20
  before MS02-039 should have updated it to a current version of the =
DLLI=20
  agree.  This is a special
case<<this is the problem =
that=20
  you just said you didn't see in your previous post.It's happened =
with NT=20
  patches as well although I didn't document that inthis thread, =
trust me=20
  it's
happened.Geo.

------=_NextPart_000_00BF_01C2C9E3.A2593670--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4