Lyle is replying to David who replied to Lyle on 11 Jul 95 06:28pm
LT->> While searching for a faster protocol I came across both HS and 
something
  ->> called Zmoby.  I have never tried the Zmoby.
 DS> I used to run a BBS for about 3 years and I seen every kind of Zmodem
 DS> protocol come over the wires in that time.  They all had 'This' feature
 DS> and 'That' feature, but when it came right down to it, the ole Zmodem in
 DS> Qmodem/QmPro always done just as good... and I didn't have to pay more
 DS> money for it. :)
 DS> BiModem is my favorite bidirectional,
Have you tried HS-link yet?  I use QMPro153dos and a 288 modem.  HS appears
to work just fine, but one claim I have yet to see is true bi/modem being 
ent
at the same time.  Sure I don't have to send and then receive, but I don't
see the send and receive lights on at the same time, they alternate.  Maybe
the only thing different is less transfer overhead.
Lyle M. Taylor - Rapid City, So. Dak - RaceNet 7223:7200/643 
FidoNet 1:293/643 - Internet Lyle.taylor@f643.n293.z1.fidonet.org
... Joseph Stalin's grave was a Communist Plot.
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.02B03P SW12290
---------------