TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: net_dev
to: imb{at}asstdc.scgt.oz.au
from: andrew clarke
date: 1996-04-02 01:20:16
subject: Re: An political question

11 Mar 96 19:01, imb{at}asstdc.scgt.oz.au wrote to Paul Edwards:

 > : What decade would you forsee the Internet reaching the dizzy
 > : heights of compressed mail?

 > Compression is always optional and has been for years. However, the
 > penalty is that you then cannot use NNTP's ability to reject individual
 > articles (messages) that you've seen before. You receive them and ignore
 > them locally.

Why doesn't NNTP compress articles individually?  (Or does/can it?)

Regards
Andrew

--- Msgedsq/2 3.30
* Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Melbourne, Australia (3:635/727.4{at}fidonet)
SEEN-BY: 50/99 78/0 620/243 635/544 727 711/409 410 413 430 808 809 934
SEEN-BY: 712/515 713/888 800/1 7877/2809
@PATH: 635/727 544 50/99 711/808 809 934

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.