| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: An political question |
11 Mar 96 19:01, imb{at}asstdc.scgt.oz.au wrote to Paul Edwards:
> : What decade would you forsee the Internet reaching the dizzy
> : heights of compressed mail?
> Compression is always optional and has been for years. However, the
> penalty is that you then cannot use NNTP's ability to reject individual
> articles (messages) that you've seen before. You receive them and ignore
> them locally.
Why doesn't NNTP compress articles individually? (Or does/can it?)
Regards
Andrew
--- Msgedsq/2 3.30
* Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Melbourne, Australia (3:635/727.4{at}fidonet)SEEN-BY: 50/99 78/0 620/243 635/544 727 711/409 410 413 430 808 809 934 SEEN-BY: 712/515 713/888 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 635/727 544 50/99 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.