| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | goliath |
PE> I don't know about QWK, but with PKT, you are supposedly meant PE> to be able to do a FREQ by sticking the "file request" flag in PE> a message and putting a filename in the subject field. BL> The trouble with QWK, is that there is no freq flag. I think you can BL> do it with a door.id file, but the QWK packet has no way to do it. Well, its more accurate to say that the original QWK format didnt allow for it. But quite a few have added that capability anyway. The same thing applys to netmail, it was kludged on after too, with the usual result when thats done, a variety of QWK readers and doors did it in a variety of different ways. BL> I can do it in rep2pkt easily enough, setting the PKT attribute, BL> but I wondered if QWK had a standard kludge like the "To:" line to BL> send netmail. Even thats not standard at all, its just one way of doing netmail. Its not even the most common way, just the most common on the Maximus style QWK doors. The RA and PCBoard QWK doors do it differently in detail. BL> No worry... I'll just put in a "Freq:" or "Attach:" line for my own use. I dunno if any that do support it do it like that, doubt it. BL> I'm a bit nervous to use rep2pkt until I've got pkt2qwk working BL> right. At least there, I'll only stuff up my own mail. True and the other problem with REP2PKT is that quite a few possible problems are undetectable by you. --- PQWK202* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.