From: "Geo." 

So build 2195.0000 worked, 2195.0001 broke it, six months later 2195.0007
fixes it. Is that not much easier than saying SP0, SP2, SP2 plus hot fix
037?

Geo.

"John Cuccia"  wrote in message
news:mqel3vc3bl6sgr3aoa9l813ch9vlp673ml{at}4ax.com...
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:33:38 -0800, "Rich"  wrote:
>
> >  I don't verify them all because I've never had a problem with the ones
I have verified.
>
> Windows 2000 SP2 broke our SMS 2.0 SP3 hierarchy.  It tooks us, along
> with PSS, almost six months to realize that it was an OS problem and
> not an SMS issue.  In the meantime, we were forced to reboot our 35+
> SMS server three to four times a week to keep them running.  See
> Q31443.  MS claims it was a bug in W2K SP1, also, but it didn't affect
> us until we rolled out SP2.  Since we deployed service packs for SQL
> Server and SMS at the same time, we suspected those. It also affected
> our Exchange 2000 infrastructure.
>
> The problem didn't show up in our lab or test environments, I assume
> because of traffic and utilization levels.
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4