From: "Adam Flinton" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_004A_01C2C844.60A320B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You didn't answer mine.

One courtesy requires another.


Adam
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e387829{at}w3.nls.net...
     You didn't answer my question.  Do you or do you not have any of =
your systems configured for automatic updates?  For any answer, why?

     Now if you are question usage within Microsoft based on any of the =
bogus speculation you may have read, you are asking the wrong questions. =
 If you are just trying to point out that people responsible for =
vulnerable systems were irresponsible, well, duh.

  Rich

    "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message =
news:3e3875e3{at}w3.nls.net...
    Ain't my dogfood. It is MS marketing's dogfood. i.e. If MS marketing =
bod gets up & says "Well those users didn't apply the patches
so...." = then users can ask "So how come you got hit because of
lacking applied = patches?"



    Adam
      "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e386d24$1{at}w3.nls.net...
         Windows Update is not SQL Server Update.  Windows Update is =
only automatic if the administrator chooses to make it so.

         How about all your computers?  Do they automatically update =
themselves?  For the cases where you have the option, do you have it = enabled?

      Rich

        "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message =
news:3e38590e{at}w3.nls.net...
        & if so & if MS patches are so thoroughly good...why weren't the =
MS SQL
        servers set to do it automatically?

        Adam


------=_NextPart_000_004A_01C2C844.60A320B0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








You didn't answer
mine.
 
One courtesy requires =
another.
 
 
Adam

  "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:3e387829{at}w3.nls.net...
     You
didn't answer my =
question. =20
  Do you or do you not have any of your systems configured for automatic =

  updates?  For any answer, why?
   
     Now if
you are question =
usage within=20
  Microsoft based on any of the bogus speculation you may have read, you =
are=20
  asking the wrong questions.  If you are just trying to point out =
that=20
  people responsible for vulnerable systems were irresponsible, well,=20
  duh.
   
  Rich
   
  

    "Adam Flinton" <adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>">mailto:adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com">adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>
= wrote in=20
    message news:3e3875e3{at}w3.nls.net...
    Ain't my dogfood. It is MS =
marketing's dogfood.=20
    i.e. If MS marketing bod gets up & says "Well those users didn't =
apply=20
    the patches so...." then users can ask "So how come you got hit =
because of=20
    lacking applied patches?"
     
     
     
    Adam
    

      "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:3e386d24$1{at}w3.nls.net...
        
Windows Update is =
not SQL Server=20
      Update.  Windows Update is only automatic if the =
administrator=20
      chooses to make it so.
       
         How
about all your=20
      computers?  Do they automatically update themselves?  =
For the=20
      cases where you have the option, do you have it =
enabled?
       
      Rich
       
      
        "Adam Flinton" <adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>=20">mailto:adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com">adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>=20
        wrote in message news:3e38590e{at}w3.nls.net...&a=
mp;=20
        if so & if MS patches are so thoroughly good...why weren't =
the MS=20
        SQLservers set to do it=20
    =
automatically?Adam=


------=_NextPart_000_004A_01C2C844.60A320B0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4