| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Why IE became popular |
From: "Rich"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C2CDEF.D4A24F80
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Too bad for you that your belief does not match reality. Usage =
statistics were readily available and despite IE 1.0 and IE 2.0 being =
right there on the desktop they did not get used much. Only with IE 3.0 =
and 4.0 did usage pick up. Clearly being on the desktop wasn't the =
reason for usage taking off. Now you are free to ignore real usage and =
believe what you wish were true.
Rich
"John Cuccia" wrote in message =
news:bhl54v0020l6nfclrvgp5bchmkiisk7p60{at}4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:38:33 -0800, "Rich" wrote:
> Among those without an agenda, which excludes Mike Miller, IE usage =
started to take off at the same time users perceived that IE was better = than the
> alternatives.
I don't have an agenda, and I think IE usage took off because it's
icon was right there on the desktop.
------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C2CDEF.D4A24F80
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Too bad
for you that your =
belief does=20
not match reality. Usage statistics were readily available and =
despite IE=20
1.0 and IE 2.0 being right there on the desktop they did not get used=20
much. Only with IE 3.0 and 4.0 did usage pick up.
Clearly = being on=20
the desktop wasn't the reason for usage taking off. Now you are =
free to=20
ignore real usage and believe what you wish were true.
Rich
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.