Amy Guskin wrote:
[snip]

> 
> Well, I'm reasonably sure there was more than a little tongue-in-cheek going 
> on there, a bit of a poke at people who appeal to their deity of choice for 
> stupid (or mean) stuff, all the while maintaining the illusion that they are 
> "good (insert religion of choice here)."  Howard, at his
absolute best, was 
> good at multilayered irreverent stuff like that.  Then it became all about 
> naked women (the appeal of which to a radio audience totally eludes me), 
> abuse of seemingly willing physically and emotionally challenged people, and 
> scatological humor, and he lost me.
> 
> Amy
> 
Talking about naked women on the radio is like phone sex, it relies on
men having memories and imagination.

Andrew Swallow
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32