Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.8)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:52:15 -0800
Received: from ns5.tzo.com ([216.55.16.67]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.8) with SMTP
          id 381047125; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:52:13 -0800
Received: from 205.201.1.216 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2004021019505350559 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:50:53 GMT
Received: (qmail 20881 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2004 00:52:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO STUARTTURK) (205.201.40.87)
  by speedbuggy.telerama.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2004 00:52:08 -0000
Message-ID: 
Reply-To: "Stu Turk" 
From: "Stu Turk" 
To: 
Subject: Kodak processing machine
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:21:06 -0500
X-Orig-MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Orig-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

    In another list I follow there was a notice that CNN reported that Kodak
is bringing out a new $30,000 dry processing machine that is suppose to
process film (film, not digital) in five minutes then make regular
non-chemical prints at low prices.  Processing and printing a roll is
suppose to be about $4.00.  The machine dispenses a disk with the images on
it but not the film/negatives.   I assume it is for C-41 film only.
     the discussion in the list seems to be between those who won't use the
new machine because they want the negatives I'd be in that group - and those
who figure what the heck, if it keeps Kodak making film then let the
snapshooters have at it.
-


--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5