TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: trek
to: All
from: Obveeus
date: 2013-06-05 09:15:52
subject: Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: Obveeus{at}aol.com
Subject: Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did You Watch?
2013-06-01 (Saturday)


"anim8rFSK"  wrote:

> In article , "Obveeus"

> wrote:
>> Notice that, despite the individual pads, they transported larger objects 
>> as
>> needed for the plot as well.  Heck, in the whale film they transported a
>> cubic area of water and whales with no trouble at all...and with one of
>> those cheap foreign transporters  If they can do that, then why would it 
>> be
>> more difficult to have transported out sections of mining tunnel?
>
> Dirt should be easier than whales, since you don't care what it looks
> like on the receiving end.

One would think.  After all, you wouldn't want the whale turning out like 
Kirk's ex-wife in STAR TREK:  TMP.

> And even if there's some reason not to use
> transporters, "It took the Starfleet Corps of Engineers ten months in
> space suits to tunnel out all this" is just silly.

Yep. 


--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (1:2320/105.97)
* Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)
SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 712/0 101 620 848
@PATH: 2320/105 0/0 261/38 712/848 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.