Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.0.451.1)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:33:51 -0700
Received: from saf.tzo.com ([216.235.248.73]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v6.0.451.1) with SMTP
          id 1299307671; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:33:49 -0700
Received: from 216.174.194.23 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2004082412355137555 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:35:51 GMT
Received: from 64-42-74-116.atgi.net ([64.42.74.116] helo=clcook_desktop.olywa.net)
 by utena.atgi.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
 id 1BzeGz-0000aP-1i
 for photo{at}fanciful.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:35:49 -0700
Message-Id: 
X-Sender: clcook{at}mail.olywa.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:38:03 -0700
To: 
From: Carl Cook 
Subject: Re: historical manuscripts
In-Reply-To: 
References: 
X-Orig-Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by CLAMAV on avmx.atgi.net

Will a bounced light minimize damage?

Why not call a local museum and ask who they use to photograph delicate 
documents, then call that person for advise. Or call your local state or 
government archive office and speak to someone there.

At 10:33 PM 8/23/2004, you wrote:

>hi gang,
>
>is there a technique preferred for transferring historical/ancient
>manuscripts to digital medium?
>the guys that asked briefly think of using a digital camera and a
>table (etc) to put them on. but they can not decide the light to use
>to avoid the harm.
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to wclistserve{at}fanciful.org with
>UNSUBSCRIBE photo in the message body on a line by itself.
>To contact the list admin, e-mail Tom.Lebens{at}fanciful.org
>---------------------------------------------------------------------

e-mail: clcook{at}olywa.net
http://www.clcookphoto.com 

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5