Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.0.451.1)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Wed, 05 May 2004 17:43:16 -0700
Received: from ns5.tzo.com ([216.55.16.67]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v6.0.451.1) with SMTP
          id 208959640; Wed, 05 May 2004 17:43:15 -0700
Received: from 67.95.238.9 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2004050520423590813 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Thu, 06 May 2004 00:42:35 GMT
Received: from QTHBHRGM [67.95.238.194] by mail.netway.net
  (SMTPD32-8.10) id AA412100080; Wed, 05 May 2004 18:43:45 -0600
Message-ID: 
From: "Richard Prentiss" 
To: "photoecho" 
Subject: film/B. Spinnenweber
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 18:42:45 -0600
X-Orig-MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_07FA_01C432D0.C17D0980"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

You can use fine point Sharpie pen to write the reload setting on the
film leader, that way you almost have to look at it! If for some reason
I end up with a complete exposed roll with the leader out, I crease it 
on a diagonal.
If it snaps off, ok too. For the overexposed film, my guess would be to 
use
diluted developer and shorten regular time by 15 or 20 %. Its only 2 
stops,
but Tmax is said to be sensitive to changes. Its an experiment!
Rich


also shot 2 rolls of 35mm (tmax 100) this past weekend on my 
motorcycle....again. And I can't wait to process those as well. I 
already knew I screwed up on 10 frames of one roll. I just grabbed a few 
cannisters in the fridge and this one was in a tmax 100 container. I 
didn't notice that the film said tmax 400....and I also didn't notice 
that I had a number 10 written on the outside of my film. The number 10 
happens to be my last frame I shot when I changed film midway. 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5