From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: anim8rfsk{at}cox.net
Subject: Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did You Watch?
2013-06-01 (Saturday)

In article ,
 "Jim G."  wrote:

> anim8rFSK sent the following on 6/4/2013 2:17 PM:
> > In article ,
> >   "Jim G."  wrote:
> >
> >> anim8rFSK sent the following on 6/3/2013 3:23 PM:
> >>> In article ,
> >>>    "Jim G."  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> David Johnston sent the following on 6/2/2013 1:48 PM:
> >>>>> On 6/2/2013 12:43 PM, Arthur Lipscomb wrote:
> >>>>>> On 6/2/2013 11:11 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Arthur Lipscomb"
 wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 6/2/2013 10:23 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, if you don't like
Chekov, you could always replace him
> >>>>>>>>> with a
> >>>>>>>>> CULT leader like they did in the
latest STAR TREK INTo DARKNESS 
> >>>>>>>>> film.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> What?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In the new film, Chekov gets 'demoted' to
red shirt status and sent 
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> engine room.  His replacement is the CULT
police captain.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Oh her, I noticed her too.  Did you catch the
cyborg.  I thought he 
> >>>>>> was
> >>>>>> an android but apparently he's part biological.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So was Data.
> >>>>
> >>>> Wait, what? Data was part biological?
> >>>
> >>> Nope.
> >>
> >> Thank you. I was thinking that I'd been messing something
very basic for
> >> a very long time.
> >
> > You can power him off and dissemble him and leave him in a box or buried
> > somewhere.  Hell, you can take off his head and bury it for 400 years in
> > an infinite loop.  There's nothing biological going on there - he's a
> > robot, period.
> 
> So you're saying that DJ is wrong?

"Almost as wrong as Clodreamer"

-- 
Dano's just a troll.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux