From: "Robert Comer" 

> Can you call W2K NT?

I don't think so, though it is a heck of a lot closer than XP.

- Bob Comer


"Geo."  wrote in message news:3e46c9d0{at}w3.nls.net...
> Can you call W2K NT? If so then consider that W2K is ver5 and XP is ver5.1
>
> Geo.
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:3e46b321$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > No, it's a horrible version of NT, but it's NT.
> >
> > I don't think we can call it that any more -- the goals of it are
totally
> > different...
> >
> >  Bob Comer
> >
> >
> > "Geo."  wrote in message
news:3e46af9c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> > > news:3e45188c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > >
> > > > Do you like using XP?  ('nuff said.)
> > >
> > > No, it's a horrible version of NT, but it's NT.
> > >
> > > Geo.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4