> Why, HP48 doesn't have an implementation of ZModem?

Not as far as I know, no :-)

 > In the message I was replying to, James was telling me
 > that the ZModem requirement in the EMSI protocol was
 > stupid...

I won't enter into a political argument about it, but I disagree.

Having a minimum protocol requirement is a good idea. And if one should be
there, it might as well be one that supports *some* distributed network
environments, "intelligent" sender/receiver negotiation, etc.

Oh well, we all have our opinions :-)

---