Hi, Bill.

BG> BG> I've been using ZIP and UNZIP for a couple of years now, and
BG> BG> they really ar bullet-proof, but unless you run OS/2, I can
BG> BG> see no real advantage in using anything other than the DOS
BG> BG> versions of PKZIP and PKUNZIP 2.04g.  Presumabl you knew that
BG> BG> versions prior to 2.04g were extremely buggy?

BG> FM> Yes, well the 2.something ones were, anyway. I thought I'd
BG> FM> said that, maybe it was in another message. 1.93alpha appears
BG> FM> to have only one bug that I've found, and it's not critical.

BG> I read too many bad things about 1.93a and all incarnations of 2.04n prior
BG> to the G rev. to even bother trying them.  2.04g has always proved to be
BG> extremely stable and backwardly compatible here.

I never heard anything bad about 1.93a, and tested it extensively before
relying on it. The 2.04n * Origin: Pedants Inc. (3:711/934.24)

SEEN-BY: 711/934

@PATH: 711/934