MVDV>> 3) It was not the error I was referring too.

 >   So what were you referring to?

Haven't you figured it out yet? The clues were here in this area...

 MVDV>> Boy are you ignorant...
 >
 >   Funny, you got all huffy when that was said to you --

And then it was explained to me - by you among others - that is is
perfectly aall right to call someone ignorant. Don't like it when you get
some of your own medicine?

 > and yet here you are saying it (without explanation) to someone else.

Nobody told me an explanation was required. In fact when I was accused of
ignorance, no explanation was given other than that it had to do with
geography. I gave you the same clue.

 >   Nor am I aware that I made an error other than the one I
 > acknowledged.

You acknowlegded you made an error, but actually it is unclear to me what
error you think you made. What error did you think you made?

 >   You can tell me what error you think I committed or not -- I
 > don't really care to play your games.

It was also explained to me that it is much better to not tell people
straight away what the error is. You must give them a chance to figure it
out for themselves so that they get the opportunity to learn from it and
save face I was told.

Naturally I would not withold you the opportunity to learn from your errors
and save face.

I already hinted that it had to do with "largest city of
Australia". The next hint is that someone in here remarked that Kiruna
is the largest city in Sweden. Follow the thread back to that message and
you will see what your error was I think.

 MVDV>> Let me give you hint:

 MVDV>> "Does your prime minister come from the largest city of
Australia?"

 >    That statement is not my error,

No but it give you a hint to where /your/ error was. Pity you missed it.
Perhaps now that I have pointed out that it is a hint, you can see it.


Cheers, Michiel

---