Hello Paul,
On Friday October 03 2014 21:25, you wrote to All:
PH> I'm looking at this document as a source of information regarding
PH> approved nodelist flags for use in a Fidonet nodelist.
PH> The document does not include the INA flag mentioned
You must have an old verison. The latest version is FTS-5001.005:
http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-5001.005
Standard Flags
--------------
Default
Flag port Description
--------------------------
INA (none) This flag sets the default Internet address used
for any non-email based flag that does not specify
its own. This flag does not carry a port number.
IP (none) Mostly used during the introduction of IP capable
systems to the nodelist, is similar to the INA flag
but may or may not specify an Internet address.
Both usages are deprecated in favour of INA.
IBN 24554 Binkp (FTS-1026 - FTS-1029)
IFC 60179 RAW ifcico (FTS-1024)
IFT 21 FTP (RFC-0959); Note there is currently no widely
accepted authentication scheme for FTP transfers by
Fidonet mailers.
ITN 23 Telnet connection using FTS-1 or any other protocol
designed for classic POTS and modem.
IVM 3141 Vmodem connection using FTS-1 or any other protocol
designed for classic POTS and modem.
INO4 (none) Indicates that an otherwise IP capable node is unable
to accept incoming connections over IPv4. (FRL-1038)
This flag does not carry an address or port number.
PH> in the available flags listed in the copy of the nodelist I see
PH> stated as "authorised for use n the Fidonet Zone 1 nodelist segment"
You are in Z3. Why do youuse the Z1 list instead of the Z3 list?
PH> At present my nodelist entry uses IBN:agency.bbs.geek.nz to achieve
PH> the same kind of outcome it would seem.
Putting the hostname behind the IBN flag is perfectly OK according to FTS-5000
and FTS-5001. In your case it is shorter than using the INA flag.
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111
* Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)
|