Hello Michiel,

>>> Point is that it wasn't Bob Satti.
>>> And how did it not become Bob Satti? Because he resigned!
>> There is no point in arguing this, because there are valid
>> differences of opinion, hashed and re-hashed, over whether an
>> IC must be a ZC.

> I think policy is clear: An IC must be a ZC.

You are wrong.  If you were right no one would ever have agreed to let Mats
sit in the chair as long as he did.  Nor George Peace...

There were others.. I have a list here somewhere, I'll find it eventually.

>> Bob Satti may have resigned as ZC, but he _never_ resigned as IC.

> Not all ZC's agreed he could stay on as IC however. And that means he was no
> longer IC when he resigned as ZC.

What's that?  You say the ZCs decided he was no longer the IC and gave in
to Ward's pressure to replace Bob Satti?

Take care,
Janis

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-5