Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.0.451.1)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:04:26 -0700
Received: from saf.tzo.com ([216.235.248.73]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v6.0.451.1) with SMTP
          id 1308343437; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:04:24 -0700
Received: from 195.112.155.162 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2004082415062712575 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:06:27 GMT
Received: from localhost ([195.112.138.234])
 by mail.ada.com.tr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7OJ73ZW019371
 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:07:04 +0300
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:13:15 +0300
From: ayse saray 
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal
Reply-To: ayse saray 
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: 
To: Carl Cook 
Subject: Re[2]: historical manuscripts
In-Reply-To: 
References: 
 
X-Orig-MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Orig-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 7:38:03 PM:

CC> Will a bounced light minimize damage?

CC> Why not call a local museum and ask who they use to photograph delicate 
CC> documents, then call that person for advise. Or call your local state or 
CC> government archive office and speak to someone there.

there are some "local" advices.
however, in such researches, i think more info is better. :)


--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5