> No, but I (and many others) obviously read Policy different to
 > you. This goes directly back to what I said above, that you
 > appear to be VERY selective in what you read and accept. This
 > position is actually causing an issue within yourself over how
 > one needs to read Policy,

 MvdV> "Needs to e=read policy" according to whom?

 MvdV> I just read what it says and it is clear on the matter: The IC
 MvdV> collects the votes.

tell us, Michiel, who collected and counted the votes when ward became IC???

 MvdV> As I said, it is not my fault that the writers of policy made
 MvdV> such a canard. But if you use policy to justify this coup and say
 MvdV> that fairness is not an issue, you should not just use the part
 MvdV> that fit your agenda.

another case of others following Z2 and Z2 complaining about the procedure
being followed???

)\/(ark