From: Mike '/m' 


I came this ->  <- close to buying one of those TI systems.  At the
time I thought it was the best of the units you mentioned.

  /m

On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 08:12:10 -0600, "Randy H"
 wrote:

>The TI implementation was right around 1982-83. SInce TI was selling it
>directly it would make some senss for it not to be included in the
>MSFT product catalog at the time--remember, the TI, Atari and
>Commodore were treated more like toys than as 'real'
>computers of their day (Apple, IBM PC, TRS-80s.)
>
>The TI never ran CP/M. It was a port to either native TMS 9900
>machine code or to the 99/4A's interpreted GPL.
>
>"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
>news:talc4vca6mh4uistak6bbeh9ats77un66m{at}4ax.com...
>>
>> In the catalog, it's listed for Apple, CP/M-80 and MS-DOS. Did the TI run
>> CP/M, or was that after 1983?
>>
>>  /m
>>
>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:03:39 -0600, "Randy H"

>> wrote:
>>
>> >Multiplan even made it to the TI 99/4A.
>> >

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4