>> Point is that it wasn't Bob Satti.

>> And how did it not become Bob Satti? Because he resigned!

 > There is no point in arguing this, because there are valid
 > differences of opinion, hashed and re-hashed, over whether an
 > IC must be a ZC.

I think policy is clear: An IC must be a ZC.

 > Historically, it hasn't been so.  I know you know there were at
 > least a few that were not ZCs, like Mats Whalen, etc.

There have been a few exeptions where policy was not followed. Mats Wheelan
(sp?) was one of them. But these exepctions were only allowed when all ZC's
agreed. In the case of Pablo Kleinman one ZC objected (Henk Wolsink) and so
Pablo did not become IC.

 > Bob Satti may have resigned as ZC, but he _never_ resigned as IC.

Not all ZC's agreed he could stay on as IC however. And that means he was
no longer IC when he resigned as ZC.


Frankly Janis, I do not care who is IC. It is painfully obvious that the IC
hat is paper tiger. We may as well have no IC, there is nothing (s)he can
do. Interzone coordination is a farce. The only "international
coordination" I have seen n the past decade is where one ZC raised two
ZC out of a coma and rounded up another one to stab another one in the
back.

I do not care who is IC. Not any more. Just don't that me what you did to
Ward was fair.

Cheers, Michiel

---