PE> Are you admitting that your original claim of 1 second was a total
PE> balls-up?

RS> Funny, could had sworn that I went thru another way of calculating
RS> the saving by archiving the PKT and got the same 6 second saving
RS> you did Paul. Are your powers of comprehension really that fucked ?

PE> My "powers of comprehension" determine that to mean
PE> "yes, I am wrong, I made a total balls-up of that".

Welp, that just goes to show how fucked your comprehension
is then doesnt it boy |-)

RS> Yes or no? Are you admitting that your original claim of the importance
RS> of that saving in a session time of 4 minutes was a total balls-up?

PE> I'm not sure that I did claim it was significant,

Corse that is implied in the way you continue to rabbit on about it for months.

PE> but 6 seconds per day for a year is $10.

And as I pointed out to you over and over again, if I really did
care about 6 secs per day, there are MUCH more productive ways of
saving MUCH more seconds and dollars than that in that mail run.

PE> $10 would buy enough lollies to keep me sick for the whole weekend.

Dont eat lollies, and am quite capable of affording $10 for some once
a year if I did, without having to save on my phone bill first Paul.

PE> I can't see any reason to throw $10 in the bin deliberately.

Yes, but thats coz you are an anal retentive Paul.

PE> So no, I still don't think that sort of money is unimportant.

Doesnt surprise me in the slightest Paul. Are your powers of observation
sufficient to allow you to realise that not too many people in this world
operate like that to ?  No, I thought not |-)

--- PQWK202