| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did |
From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: anim8rfsk{at}cox.net
Subject: Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did You Watch?
2013-06-01 (Saturday)
In article ,
wdstarr{at}panix.com (William December Starr) wrote:
> In article ,
> anim8rFSK said:
>
> > wdstarr{at}panix.com (William December Starr) wrote:
> >
> >> Incremental testing: first you try creating just a life-bearing
> >> planet, then you try creating a life-bearing planet _and_ a star
> >> for it to orbit.
> >
> > Except the stolen unit was preset to make the latter.
>
> Was it, or was it just preprogrammed to "If you're on a planet,
> remake the planet. If you're in a big pile of disorganized matter,
> and there's enough of it to make a star and a planet, make a star
> and a planet."?
Fair point, but what does it do if you've just got, say, Yonada, or the
asteroid headed at Mirimani?
>
> (Or, could Khan have reprogrammed it? Probably not.)
Yeah, he didn't have access to Carol, who programmed it in the first
film, or David, who programmed it in the retcon.
--
Dano's just a troll.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
* Origin: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy! (1:2320/105.97)* Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1) SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 712/0 101 620 848 @PATH: 2320/105 0/0 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.