From: doctor{at}doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)

In article ,
Stephen Wilson  wrote:
>
>"Michael Kilpatrick"
 wrote in message 
>news:O6GdnYv0G9HbgKLWnZ2dnUVZ8iydnZ2d{at}pipex.net...
>> Erm, I wasn't really concentrating fully towards the end of End Of Time 
>> (because I thought it was pretty rubbish).
>>
>> So, what was the actual fate of Gallifrey at the end? Was it merely sent 
>> back into its nice cosy bubble in time, or was it actually destroyed?
>>
>> P.S. By "destroyed" I mean "destroyed" in the
real sense, not in the RTD 
>> sense which just means "temporarily destroyed".
>
>The RTD sense of "destroyed" appears to coincide with the
general definition 
>in science fiction/fantasy.
>
>> I'm assuming that ultimately, in some way or other, that Gallifrey will 
>> return. It can't really be left hanging around in a bubble for the rest of 
>> Dr Who's TV existence.
>
>It's not been brought back. It's not been destroyed. It's been left in a 
>position where it can be used or ignored by future writers. If they decide 
>to leave it where it is, then yes - it can be left hanging in a bubble, 
>temporarily, indefinitely or permanently.
>
>
>

Sounds good to me.
-- 
Member - Liberal International	This is doctor{at}nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor{at}nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising! 
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630 
Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010

--- Internet Rex 2.29