RM> p259, Library Reference, BC++4.0, 1993, stricmp(). The manual
RM> states specifically that the function is defined by the ANSI C
RM> standard, and is included in the ANSI C++ proposal. Is this wrong?

IF it says that, it is certainly wrong.  I only have BC++ 3.1,
and it does NOT claim that that function is ANSI.  BTW, I have
the ANSI C draft available for FREQ from here, ANSI_C.*, which
is AFAIK identical to the real thing.  Are you sure you're not
just misreading the manual?  strcmp() is indeed ANSI/ISO.
BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---