This Echo is READ ONLY !   NO Un-Authorized Messages Please!
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FYI
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Science Policy News
Number 10: January 29, 2003

Representatives Press for U.S. Participation in ITER

President Bush sends his FY 2004 budget request to Congress next 
Monday.  Of great interest to the fusion community is what the 
Department of Energy will request for the Fusion Energy Sciences 
Program.  Yesterday, five key members of the House Science Committee 
wrote to Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, telling him: "We urge you 
to send a clear message to the ITER community that the U.S. plans to 
participate in the negotiations and the subsequent design, 
construction and operation of the facility."  The Bush Administration 
is expected to announce its decision regarding U.S.  participation in 
the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor in the near 
future.

The full text of this letter, signed by House Science Committee 
Chairman Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY), Ranking Minority Member Ralph Hall 
(D-TX), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Vernon Ehlers (R-MI) and George Nethercutt 
(R-WA) follows:

"Dear Mr. Secretary:

"We are writing to express our support for U.S. participation in one 
of the most important endeavors being undertaken by the international 
energy sciences community -  the ITER project.  Since the 1998 U.S. 
withdrawal from ITER, the project has been substantially redesigned, 
its costs have been greatly reduced and a strong consensus has 
developed in the scientific community in favor of U.S. participation.  
The November 20, 2002, letter to Dr. Orbach from the NRC Burning 
Plasma Assessment Committee also supported this participation but 
specified: 'any U.S. involvement should at a minimum guarantee

* access to all data from ITER,
* the right to propose and carry out experiments, and
* a role in producing the high technology components of the facility,
consistent with the size of the U.S. contribution to the program.'

"At the next ITER meeting in February, the roles of the participants 
will be set. Our failure to attend this meeting would jeopardize our 
ability to participate fully in the project and severely disadvantage 
our fusion energy program.  In light of such factors, it is clearly 
time for the Department of Energy to take the necessary steps to 
reenter the ITER negotiations and to prepare for a renewed partnership 
in ITER.

"With our increasing reliance on imported fossil fuels, and growing 
concern about greenhouse gas emissions, other potential sources of 
power must be aggressively pursued.  In the case of fusion, it seems 
clear that international collaboration is the most efficient and 
affordable path to a commercial energy source.  With the support of 
the Administration, the concurrence of Congress and with your 
leadership, the U.S. contribution to ITER will benefit the U.S. 
science and technology base.  Even though it will be years before 
fusion energy can be used to generate electric power, the eventual 
payoff of a large new supply of clean energy is too great to ignore.

"For the past five years, ITER negotiations have continued without 
U.S.  involvement.  We urge you to send a clear message to the ITER 
community that the U.S. plans to participate in the negotiations and 
the subsequent design, construction and operation of the facility.  
Funding of ITER reentry at a credible level will guarantee that the 
U.S. research community will have the strongest voice possible in 
positioning itself in the project and its work packages.  We must 
ensure that our domestic fusion program is strong and that a new 
generation of scientists is inspired to work in this area.

"We thank you for your attention to this matter and look forward to 
your support of ITER and domestic fusion energy research."

Approximately two months ago, in remarks before a National Research 
Council committee, John Marburger, Director of the Office of Science 
and Technology Policy, stated: "I believe the US fusion community 
needs access to a burning plasma experiment, and the time frame for 
the decision to enter into ITER is being driven by ongoing 
negotiations. The ITER parties are on schedule to reach a consensus on 
a preferred site, cost sharing arrangements and a Director General in 
or around April 2003. Should the Administration decide to enter ITER, 
it would be desirable to have the US enter sooner rather than later." 
(See FYI #136 at http://www.aip.org/enews/fyi/2002/136.html).

As reported earlier in FYI #102 at
http://www.aip.org/enews/fyi/2002/102.html,  the Fusion Energy 
Sciences Advisory Committee issued a report last fall stating: "Since 
ITER is at an advanced stage, has the most comprehensive science and 
technology program, and is supported internationally, we should now 
seek to join the ITER negotiations with the aim of becoming a partner 
in the undertaking."  "The desired role is that the U.S. participates 
as a partner in the full range of activities, including full 
participation in the governance of the project and the program. We 
anticipate that this level of effort will likely require additional 
funding of approximately $100M/yr."

The FY 2003 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill has still 
not been passed, with many on Capitol Hill now predicting that a final 
omnibus bill containing all eleven outstanding appropriations bills 
will not be completed until the later part of February.  Last 
September, the House passed a bill that would flat-line DOE's Fusion 
Energy Sciences Program budget at the FY 2002 level of $248.5 million.  
The Senate version of this bill, passed earlier in the year, would 
have increased program funding by 4.4%, or $10.8 million for FY 2003.

###############
Richard M. Jones
Media and Government Relations Division
The American Institute of Physics
fyi{at}aip.org
(301) 209-3094
##END##########

 - End of File -
================

---