RC>>> But he does have the idea,

 BK>>  He hasn't had a real idea in all the years he has been polluting
 BK>>  the echos I have seen him in idiot.

 RC> I am seeing the same elements in your behavior that we have
 RC> seen come from Wayne, perhaps you have a chance here, go
 RC> get yourself looked at to make sure you arent going to have
 RC> a stroke?

 You changed the topic. Your reply is nothing but an attempt at
 flame, and has zero to do with the above comment by me.

 I am seeing the same elements in your behavior I see in the
 tagline heros who turned this into a flame echo.

 RC>>> why dont you shut up for once?

 BK>>  Because I participate in real discussions.

 RC> Since when is " I know you are but what am I " considered
 RC> real discussions?

 Since when are your ad hominem and non-sequitors and digressions
 considered real discussions, or even relevant to the above?

 The fact that I participated in discussions with those who
 disagreed with me, in this echo, with zero flames, proves you a
 liar.

 The fact that I participate in discussions with those who
 disagree with me, in two other echos, where flames are
 forbidden, proves you a liar.

 The fact that you do not participate in political discussions
 without flames proves you are the one who is projecting your
 irrational hatred onto others.

 RC>>> I explained this in great detail to Wayne, he didnt
 RC>>> comprehend it, maybe you will?

 BK>>  Ask me if I care.

 RC> Oh but you do, else you wouldnt have chastized Ed over it.

 Not about the way you get your message base. That is totally
 irrelevant to the issue.

 RC>>> On my system, my message bases are in a format known as

 BK>>  Irrelevant to the point.

 RC> Very relevant, SQ2HTM wont work on a JAM message base.

 Does that mean it's impossible for you to put the right wingers
 into your matzdobre database? How are you getting anyone else?

 RC>>> There is a program I use called FTRACK which can read from

 BK>>  Irrelevant to the point.

 RC> Well FTRACK would work on a JAM message base, but see above.

 Why would I care *HOW* you get them? It's why you don't that is
 the issue.

 RC>>> I will have ftrack scan each message nightly in a given
 RC>>> area:

 BK>>  Not that anyone really cares.

 RC> If I dont have FTRACK scan, it wouldnt work, sheesh.

 Why would I care if it works or not?

 RC>>> if the message is authored by a certain person

 BK>>  When you do it for everyone in the echo let me know. Until then
 BK>>  it's irrelevant.

 RC> Not everyone is looney tune, mostly you, Wayne, Otto and
 RC> the other 7 people are, c'mon Bob, havent you been paying
 RC> attention?

 IOW, every one who dares to disagree with you qualifies, by your
 standards, as looney tunes. Ok, those who agree with you are
 satanically evil. How's that?

 BK>>  The rest deleted. How it's done is not the point. Why it's not
 BK>>  done for every poster is the point.

 RC> Lets see..

 RC> I registered the domain name and paid for it - Check.

 RC> I paid to have it hosted - check

 RC> That must make me the webmaster?

 RC> Check again!!

 Yep. Which has nothing to do with the question of why you don't
 do it for everyone.

 RC> I'll sell it to you for $5000.00

 The only reason I would consider it is to correct your lack of
 integrity in that you only archive those who disagree with you.

 Oh, do you archive all the messages, or do you delete the ones
 you don't want the world to see?



BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... Before Hardegree-no flames: Richardson more flames: Hulett-all cheap shots.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a