Path:
number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!area.cu.mi.it!diesel.cu.mi.it!seltaeb.ghgcorp.com!rmb-mod
From: Dave Hinz 
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles.moderated,rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Let it Be Guitar Solo(s)
Followup-To: rec.music.beatles.moderated
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 05:44:56 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: cis.dfn.de
Lines: 26
Approved: rmbm-request{at}seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Message-ID: 
References: 
 
NNTP-Posting-Host: seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
X-Trace: area.cu.mi.it 1117259096 30052 64.243.71.18 (28 May 2005 05:44:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse{at}diesel.cu.mi.it
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 05:44:56 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Debian)
Originator: rmb-mod{at}seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.music.beatles.moderated:16658
rec.music.beatles:930730

On Thu, 26 May 2005 18:52:14 +0000 (UTC), Karl Uppiano
 wrote:
>
> "Dave Hinz"  wrote in message 
> news:3fgsf2F7ccm2U5{at}individual.net...
>> On Tue, 24 May 2005 06:08:30 +0000 (UTC), Karl Uppiano 
>>  wrote:
>>> It's as if they overdubbed a
>>> more muted (and also less musically appealing) solo for the single.
>>
>> Nope, it's an entirely different performance.
>
> That's amazing, since everything else seems identical. The hi-hat echo is 
> the only other thing I notice, and that could be added in post-production. 
> And it doesn't explain the guitar embellishments after the solo that sound 
> the same on both versions.

Lewison's book probably has the gritty details, but my copy is in a box
that hasn't been opened since I moved two times ago.  Maybe someone
else here can refresh my memory?


--

All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated.    
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup, please 
change your headers appropriately.   -- the moderators
---
 þ Derby City GateWorks:  UUCP  FidoNet