Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.8)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:17:45 -0700
Received: from saf.tzo.com ([216.55.16.67]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.8) with SMTP
          id 235707156; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:17:43 -0700
Received: from 216.174.194.20 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2004041120213356295 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:21:33 GMT
Received: from 64-42-71-40.atgi.net ([64.42.71.40] helo=BananaNose)
 by anthy.atgi.net with smtp (Exim 4.31)
 id 1BCpDf-0002w4-1z
 for photo{at}fanciful.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:22:35 -0700
Message-ID: 
From: "Carl Cook" 
To: 
References: 
Subject: Re: New paper in town
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:12:56 -0700
X-Orig-MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Orig-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by CLAMAV on avmx.atgi.net

D surface, eh? I have been using E surface for a long time. I'll have a look
next time I go to my favorite supplier. I like both Kodak and Ilford, except
many Ilford papers won't tone in selenium, while Kodak's suck it right up.


clcook{at}olywa.net
http://www.clcookphoto.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Prentiss" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 11:08 AM
Subject: New paper in town


> Kodak is releasing a new b&w paper,
> Professional Polycontrast IV in fine
> luster "D" surface. This is replacing
> Polymax RC and Polycontrast III.
> Don't know what all you expert think
> of Kodak papers, in these parts we
> mostly can lay hands on Kodak or
> Ilford papers, and lucky to have those.
> Rich
>

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5