From: "Paul Ranson" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01F5_01C2E42F.D16813D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think it will have way more functionality. The cost is insignificant =
compared to all the other costs of running a web server.

I think your choice of phrase 'just for a web server' shows where you're =
coming from. I think you're out of date/touch.

Paul
  "Robert Comer"  wrote in message =
news:3e67b7d1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Less functionality, higher cost. Ease of use is a draw, but it would =
have to be even cheaper just for a web server.

  - Bob Comer


    "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e67b63f{at}w3.nls.net...
       By what criteria and how so?

    Rich

      "Robert Comer"  wrote in message =
news:3e67ae88$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      That's not good enough to compete with Linux.

      - Bob Comer


      "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:3e67a4e1$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/29567.html
      >
      > There will be no price increases (as such) when Microsoft ships =
its next
      > server OS, Windows Server 2003, on April 24th, but there will be =
a new
      > budget-priced version of the product aimed squarely at the web =
server
      > market. Server 2003 Web Edition comes without client access =
licences, with
      a
      > 2gig limit on memory, 2-way SMP, and is $399.
      >
      >


------=_NextPart_000_01F5_01C2E42F.D16813D0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








I think it will have way more =
functionality. The=20
cost is insignificant compared to all the other costs of running a web=20
server.
 
I think your choice of phrase
'just for =
a web=20
server' shows where you're coming from. I think you're out of=20
date/touch.
 
Paul

  "Robert Comer" <bobcomer{at}mindspring.com>">mailto:bobcomer{at}mindspring.com">bobcomer{at}mindspring.com>
= wrote in=20
  message news:3e67b7d1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Less functionality, higher
cost. Ease =
of use is a=20
  draw, but it would have to be even cheaper just for a web =
server.
   
  - Bob Comer
   
   
  

    "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:3e67b63f{at}w3.nls.net...
       By
what criteria and =
how=20
    so?
     
    Rich
     
    
      "Robert Comer" <bobcomer{at}mindspring.com>=20">mailto:bobcomer{at}mindspring.com">bobcomer{at}mindspring.com>=20
      wrote in message news:3e67ae88$1{at}w3.nls.net...That's=20
      not good enough to compete with Linux.- Bob=20
      Comer"Geo." <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote in =
message news:3e67a4e1$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
>=20
      http://www.th" target="new">http://www.th=">http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/29567.html">http://www.th=
eregister.co.uk/content/61/29567.html>>=20
      There will be no price increases (as such) when Microsoft ships =
its=20
      next> server OS, Windows Server 2003, on April 24th, but =
there will=20
      be a new> budget-priced version of the product aimed =
squarely at=20
      the web server> market. Server 2003 Web Edition comes =
without=20
      client access licences, witha> 2gig limit
on memory, =
2-way SMP,=20
      and is=20
$399.>>

------=_NextPart_000_01F5_01C2E42F.D16813D0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4