* In a message originally to Bill Starr, Charles Evans exlaimed:
 ce>> -> But as a System Operator I know that someone must have asked you to
 ce>> -> carry that echo and shown some interest or you would not be carrying
 ce>> -> it. Sysop's don't carry echos that have no interest to their users!

 ce>> -> It is wasted disk space! Either the sysop or one or more of his users
 ce>> -> have an interest in the echo.

 ce>> This, like so many of the Perot-like pronouncements, is basically
 ce>> incorrect.  My original statement was that carrying the Perot Echo does
ce>> not constitute support of his beliefs.  I stand by that statement.

Charles,

I am not sure which lines you are trying to read between, but I don't see what
is wrong with what Bill had to say....and it looks to me like you jumped to
some sort of conclusion based on something that isn't in his text.

Please re-read Bill's comment above. You will not that no where does it say
that people support Perot by carrying the ECHO...only that carrying the ECHO
is a sign of "interest" in the ECHO. How can you deny that? 
-Quentin

--- GEcho 1.00

---------------