On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:25:16 -0400, Ron  wrote:
>On 6/29/2014 9:15 AM, FredW wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 18:35:12 -0400, Ron  wrote:
>>> On 6/28/2014 6:09 PM, Dustin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> MBAM is *NOT* antivirus. You still need antivirus whether or not you use
>>>> MBAM.
>>>
>>> I *KNOW* that. And Norton is *NOT* an anti-malware program.
>>>
>>> Fred was being a smartass and I was just giving it right back to him.
>>
>> Oh dear, you *know* what other people think or what their intentions
>> are?
>> And you can read that from your computer screen?
>>
>> I do not believe in psychics.
>> You are just trolling.
>>
>
>Asking charlie if he didn't trust NAV wasn't being a smartass?

No.

I do not see the logic why charliec uses NAV (or any AV product) to warn
for an intruder and then uses Mbam to remove the intruder.
I wonder why doesn't he use his AV software to not only warn for an
intruder but also to remove the intruder.

So I asked for a possible explanation.
(and thanks to you, I guess we will never get an answer.)


I have told charliec how he could uninstall Mbam 2.0.2 and install 1.75.
I have told him how he could prevent 1.75 from updating to 2.0.2.
I have told him Mbam is NOT anti-virus but anti-malware.
(and Dustin confirmed this because you did ask the same question.)
All that time you contributed NOTHING.

But you are so suspicious that you talk about non-existing prejudices
and non-existing bad behavior.
Why? Bad tempered? Trolling?


I am just a user with a good AV product and Mbam Pro both running
real-time without problems.
When I think I can help someone (in this case charliec) I tell what I do
and how my settings are.
It is then up to the person I try to help to do as I do or not.
That choice is not mine.


As I said before, for me you are only trolling, interfering with false
accusations and only argumenting to disrupt this discussion.

I quit trying to help charliec, you may do so.


Have a nice day.

-- 
Fred W. (NL)
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2