Path:
number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!area.cu.mi.it!diesel.cu.mi.it!seltaeb.ghgcorp.com!rmb-mod
From: Danny Caccavo 
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles.moderated,rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Let it Be Guitar Solo(s)
Followup-To: rec.music.beatles.moderated
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:09:22 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: -
Lines: 29
Approved: rmbm-request{at}seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Message-ID: 
References: 
 



NNTP-Posting-Host: seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
X-Trace: area.cu.mi.it 1118538562 11373 64.243.71.18 (12 Jun 2005 01:09:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse{at}diesel.cu.mi.it
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:09:22 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X)
Originator: rmb-mod{at}seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.music.beatles.moderated:16689
rec.music.beatles:933153

In article ,
 Luke Pacholski  wrote:

> In article 
> ,
>  Danny Caccavo  wrote:
> 
> >The LIBN version was kind of a fake - they wanted the original 
> >performance, but the bass guitar and original solo had been wiped from 
> >the original take used on the single and album.  So when you listen to 
> >it, it's Paul's bass overdub, until the solo, where it edits to an 
> >outtake (in order to get a live solo), and then suddenly it's John 
> >playing bass (as he did live).  Then they stick to this alternate take, 
> >I think.....
> 
> You're sure they wiped that stuff (and didn't make a safety)? Or is that 
> just an assumption?
> 
> Luke

An assumption. Otherwise, why would the Naked version be so patchwork?

dc

--

All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated.    
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup, please 
change your headers appropriately.   -- the moderators
---
 þ Derby City GateWorks:  UUCP  FidoNet