| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did |
From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: JRStern{at}foobar.invalid
Subject: Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did You Watch?
2013-06-01 (Saturday)
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:14:04 -0400, "Obveeus" wrote:
>> Why else have these little personal-size transporter pads. Maybe a
>> bigger pad tends to implode or split your personality or something.
>
>Notice that, despite the individual pads, they transported larger objects as
>needed for the plot as well. Heck, in the whale film they transported a
>cubic area of water and whales with no trouble at all...and with one of
>those cheap foreign transporters If they can do that, then why would it be
>more difficult to have transported out sections of mining tunnel?
Again, for a one-time event, mebbe.
Also that was a somewhat later version of the transporter, fwiw, and
maybe with no safety margins, not that they'd want to deliver a
mashed-up whale under the circumstances but you gotta take risks.
So it's not *always* just a deus ex machina, ... but almost.
J.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
* Origin: usenet unanimous (1:2320/105.97)* Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1) SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 712/0 101 620 848 @PATH: 2320/105 0/0 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.