Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.8)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:05:05 -0800
Received: from saf.tzo.com ([216.55.16.67]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.8) with SMTP
          id 446616250; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:05:02 -0800
Received: from 206.46.170.135 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2004021114025811781 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:02:58 GMT
Received: from BobDial ([67.249.22.170]) by out011.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP
          id 
          for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:04:55 -0600
Message-ID: 
From: "Bob Dial" 
To: 
References: 


Subject: Re: Kodak processing machine
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:44:24 -0600
X-Orig-MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
X-Orig-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out011.verizon.net from
[67.249.22.170] at Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:04:19 -0600


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stu Turk" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 6:03 AM
Subject: Re: Kodak processing machine

And the frantic stampede to mediocraty races on!  

BobD

----


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Prentiss" 
>
>
> > This would be the system originally invented by
> > Applied Science Fiction, where the film is
> > chemically developed (not really dry) to
> > total completion, being scanned in IR with
> > enough resolution to separate the different
> > color layers. Wet processing, but no effluent
> > no need for a drain. The negatives are said
> > to be totally black, do you still want them?
>
>        I wouldn't want the film after it was process by this machine but
if
> I shot anything I wanted to keep the negatives of I probably wouldn't go
> near this machine.  :-)Most people don't keep their negatives so it
probably
> doesn't make any difference to them.  But as someone on the list I picked
up
> that article on pointed out, equipment keeps changing and today's cd-rom
> disk may be unprintable due to lack of equipment  some years down the
road.
> But we can still print negatives shot 50 or more years ago.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to wclistserve{at}fanciful.org with
> UNSUBSCRIBE photo in the message body on a line by itself.
> To contact the list admin, e-mail Tom.Lebens{at}fanciful.org
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>