"Carl"  wrote in message
news:ifOdnbz-eIzOzN_bnZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d{at}comcast.com...
> Wendy of NJ wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 May 2007 21:15:44 -0500, "Carl"

> > wrote:
> 
>
> >>> Yes. I was talking simply about not taxing income derived from
> >>> artistic endeavors, and by doing that "supporting
the arts" as
> >>> opposed to "supporting the artIST"
> >>>
> >>
> >> The exemption would be without bound?
> >
> > I wouldn't think so. I think when an artist reaches the income level
> > that we've defined as "rich", they should be subject to tax.
>
> Someone decided to commit to a definition?
> *Please* let me know what that definition of "rich" is.

Anyone not on government assistance?


Dennis


.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32