DD> It doesn't seem to have a "licence agreement".

BG> Must be just a collection of full-on PD code then.

PE> Code is copyright unless there is an explicit PD notice.

AWL> But ownership of that copyright may be problematical...

Depends on what you call problematical. It may well be a problem
working out WHO owns the copyright, but that doesnt really matter a
stuff if you just need to know you cant reuse it at will coz its not PD.

--- PQWK202