On Aug 23, 1997, Jim Trulock wrote:
JS> I think the ending fell a little short.
JT> Yes, the ending of IT was kinda lame. They left out the
JT> Turtle completely (remember, the creature that created the
JT> universe one day when it had a belly ache ), didn't cover
JT> ALL of the children's past (well, it was "made for TV", so
JT> *some* of it had to be left out ), and didn't explain the
JT> "dead lights" like the book did. It also didn't cover the
JT> town's history as well as the book did (listing all the
JT> tragedies that occurred in the town).
I have to agree with all of the above, Jim. The movie fell short on the
"dead lights" for sure and, if you remember (book), the town was virtually
destroyed in the end. With today's special effects, they could've done
better. I wanted to see the standpipe go down.
JT> But all in all, it was a good movie. One of the first my
JT> daughter really liked. Now, if I can just get her to read
JT> the book. ;)
I agree there, too. I have "IT" on tape along with others like "The Stand",
"The Langoliers", and the TV version of "The Shining". Getting the
youngsters to read _anything_ can be a chore. ;) Maybe... "The Eyes of the
Dragon" or "The Talisman".
Best,
-Jack
ogre@nashville.com
--- Squish/386 v1.11
---------------
* Origin: UltraTech - Nashville, TN ftpMS Hub {V.34/V.FC} (1:116/30)
|