Hi Greg,

 GH> Well, if you are reading this, then I
 GH> have been successful at using a foreign olr.

Boo, hiss....

 GH> Just want to see what we are missing on on with regards to
 GH> features.

And just as importantly, the things that it has missing WRT QWKRR. :-)

 GH> This is my first message, so I'm not sure off all the features

So you read the manual huh ?   

 GH> BTW, Maybe I'll find out about netmailing
 GH> settings too.  Hi Artie!  ;-)

Yes, please do.  I still think that you'll find all netmail formatting
needs to be performed manually, but if not, then I'm still very
interested as to how it works, what formats it knows, etc, etc.

 GH> Hmm, the spell checker feature works well.

Unfortunately a QWKRR spell checker is a long way off.

 GH> Mind you, echo mail has its own unique language.

So ?  upgrade the check-speller.  :-)

Anyway, I really am interested on how QWKRR compares with other OLR's.
I notice that Even though MarkD has the choice he is still using QWKRR,
I know that there are *several* others in USA that prefer QWKRR too.

This really does surprise me somewhat though, so I'm not looking for
pats on the back. What I am interested in is ways to close the
remaining gaps, and simply make QWKRR even better.

Cheers
Rod

___ QWKRR128 V4.3b [R]

--- EzyQwk V1.10b1




SD®¯á