PE> I have serious doubts about that!  No, I'm just after systems
PE> in the nodelist that are happy to have points off them.

AWL> Which nodelist?

PE> The only one that isn't a wank.

AWL> Paul, you are indeed a pleasure to communicate with.
AWL> That message would be invaluable if I were to take the
AWL> Fido-sillyness to the HREOC. (Rod, have you noticed this?)

Pathetic Alex. He can choose to have any sort of list he likes,
including restricting it to just NSW systems, just those in Sydney,
just those that he thinks are sufficiently fascist to no have normal
users, only points. Says sweet fuck all about anything at all as far
as the HREOC is concerned Alex. Essentially because anyone else who
wants to have any other list with any other selection criterion, is
perfectly free to do HIS OWN list Alex.

You really do need to take a serious look at yourself Alex, coz
your understanding of the law is so utterly pathetic that you
stand a very real risk of loosing lots of money in legal actions
which dont stand a chance of success. None, zero, nada, ziltch.

AWL> Nodelists other than FidoNet are mostly tiny circlejerks
AWL> of loonies, or specialised tools like NBBNet and TWMBANet...

Thats life. That doesnt give you any rights whatever to be declaiming
on how Fido has to do things the way you demand they be done Alex.

AWL> There are a few largish ones, PODS AmigaNet etc,
AWL> but they have nothing like the coverage of FidoNet...
AWL> So Rod's go start your own line fall flat...

Bullshit it does, its not Fidos fault if no one
bothers with doing their own, presumably because most
dont disagree with how fido operates enough to bother.

Thats the fucking LAW Alex, one day you might just notice.

--- PQWK202