PE> Is LOCUSER a fidonet echo?

BG> It is actually.  Ask David.  :)

DD> Hmmmm what defines a FidoNet echo?  It is being
DD> moved by FidoNet nodes using FidoNet addresses . .

AWL> Ask LTUAE. They have LTUAE net to avoid P4
AWL> and those who seem incapable of finding a
AWL> protologist to remove their ingrown copy of P4...

Just why are you so determined to be a fido node if you hate so much of
fido Alex ?  Must be a surfeit of dogshit between the ears or something.

Corse the other distinct possibility is that you done actually have
any intention of becoming a fido node, and are just making a complete
prick of yourself like a 4 year old, and have nothing better to do with
your time. And when thats how you are operating with that other group
of volunteers, thats a very likely possibility indeed.

The simple answer is that there is no simple definition of
what constitutes a fido echo. And who gives a stuff anyway ?

AWL> I've seen clues from the US that indicate that Backbone status
AWL> is what determines it for echos that pass outside of nets.

Bullshit, you have just been playing with yourself again.

AWL> I suspect that the Moderator and NC make that ruling for Net based echos.

Welp, you suspect wrong.

AWL> Apart from that who knows...

Clearly not you |-)

--- PQWK202