David Noon wrote on 04 Jan 1996 at 21:15 to Ruud Senden:

RS> difficult to generate). Since REXX only checks for (syntax-
RS> )errors while executing the program, those parts are not 
RS> tested for syntax-errors.

 DN> This is not correct. The code -- other than inside INTERPRET
 DN> statements -- is syntax checked by the tokenizer when the REXX exec
 DN> is loaded.

Well, I have tried some things, but it doesn't recognize the errors I
introduced. For example, if a long REXX-command is divided over multiple
lines, there should be a , at the end of each line as a continuation
character. But when I leave the , away, the REXX-program still runs, until
it comes to that piece of code, where REXX generates a syntax error.

Regards,
  Ruud  (Internet: rsenden{at}cs.ruu.nl) 

--- timEd/2 1.10+